Brand Positioning: Price or Differentiation?
- Gökhan Korkmaz
- Mar 19
- 3 min read

Jack Trout’s famous quote, “If you don’t have a unique selling point, then it’s better for your price to be low,”perfectly summarizes one of the key pillars of branding. In today’s competitive market, if a brand lacks a distinctive point of differentiation from its competitors, price becomes the most influential factor in consumer decision-making. However, this leads to a critical question: Is a low-price strategy sustainable in the long run?
Price or Differentiation?
To answer this question, it’s useful to look at globally successful brands like Dyson. Instead of engaging in price competition, Dyson positioned itself in the premium segment through superior innovation and an enhanced customer experience. When company founder James Dyson invented the bagless vacuum cleaner with significantly stronger suction compared to traditional vacuum cleaners, it revolutionized the industry. However, this innovative approach eliminated the need for Dyson to compete on price. Instead, Dyson established itself as a technology-driven, high-performance brand, justifying its premium price.
To better understand Dyson’s pricing strategy, we can compare it with other vacuum cleaner brands in the market. Although there are much more affordable alternatives, Dyson is perceived by consumers as a brand synonymous with quality, durability, and cutting-edge technology. But how did Dyson achieve this?
Price Competition and Sustainability
A low-price strategy may seem attractive, particularly for brands targeting price-conscious consumers. However, implementing this strategy is not just about lowering prices. A successful low-price strategy requires:
• Strict cost control: Efficiency in production, logistics, supply chain, and operational processes is essential. Without a cost advantage, a brand that continuously offers discounts risks financial losses.
• Leveraging economies of scale: Brands with high sales volumes can take advantage of low-cost production to maintain competitive prices.
• Maintaining brand perception: Brands following a low-price strategy must ensure they don’t develop a “low quality” perception. Effective brand communication is crucial to positioning themselves as affordable yet trustworthy.
However, Dyson deliberately avoided price competition. Instead, its innovations allowed it to turn price into a strength, positioning it as a marker of quality and superiority.
The Importance of Differentiation
Brands that wish to avoid price wars must find ways to stand out in the market. Offering consumers unique value helps escape price-based competition. Dyson’s success was built on several differentiation strategies, including:
• Product or service innovation: Dyson didn’t just make vacuum cleaners; it pioneered high-performance motors, cordless operation, air purifiers, and hair dryers—introducing cutting-edge technology to set itself apart from competitors.
• Customer experience: Dyson provides not just a product but an exclusive experience. With sleek designs, durable products, and user-friendly features, it delivers a premium experience.
• A strong brand story: James Dyson’s story—creating 5,127 prototypes before perfecting his product—showcases the company’s dedication to innovation. This narrative reinforces Dyson’s brand identity as a company that produces engineering marvels.
Which Strategy is More Advantageous?
Depending on market dynamics and a brand’s positioning, a price-focused or differentiation strategy can be chosen. However, in the long run, competing solely on price is rarely sustainable. Dyson and similar brands have successfully created premium categories by leading with innovation rather than price.
Successful brands often strike a balance between these two strategies. While some brands aim for affordability, those that also provide a unique customer experience or differentiated value gain a stronger foothold in the market. However, brands like Dyson prove that differentiation—not price—can justify premium positioning and drive long-term success.
Conclusion: What Should Brands Do?
Brands must make a conscious choice between “price” and “differentiation.” If your brand doesn’t offer a clear point of difference, competing on price may be the only option. However, for long-term profitability, brands must either sustain their cost advantage or differentiate themselves in a meaningful way.
The Dyson example highlights that differentiation is not just a path to success—it is also the key to achieving sustainable growth over time. 🚀
Comments